[lit-ideas] Re: Iran is angry at itself
- From: Eric <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:34:49 -0500
>>a raving Hanson
Huh?? If that was raving, I'd be curious to learn what you consider
nonraving. He counsels peace, international cooperation, and calm
political rhetoric. Of course, he calls the Iranians names, but they
really do deserve it.
>>when you can show me evidence that the BBC is anything other than
objective,
Two people divided by a common language again. Sure the story is
"objective" as far as it goes. The question is whether it became a news
item (a) to warn about possible crazy US military moves, or (b) to warn
the crazy Iranian government.
It had to "become" a news item because it is nothing new. There have
always been attack plans, there have always been target lists, and there
have always been triggers -- just as the Iranians have always had
defense plans, have always had counterattack lists, have always had
triggers for both retaliation and negotiation.
Listening to Lehar's "Giuditta" waltz (Vienna Strauss Orchestra / Willi
Boskovsky) on Windows Media Player 11 and wincing at the sound quality,
Eric
putting my c.v. out to the Bright Side of the Force
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
