[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Erin Holder <erin.holder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:57:15 -0500
Net-trahlly. Wait no, ahem. NEH-trahlly! Wait, wait. Nehhhtrahhllyy. I'll
work on it.
Erin
Going to sleep in TO
(I actually think I have slept for 80% of this day)
Quoting david ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
>
> Good thing too. Far too many Germans in the place already. And Greeks.
>
> Oh, but there is a way, Erin...I believe that several of the royal
> Germans are, as yet, unhitched. Practice now, "At this time of ye-
> ahr one's thoughts turn, net-trahlly, to Kant..."
>
> David Ritchie
> Portland, Oregon
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
--
Erin
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: david ritchie
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Judith Evans
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Erin Holder
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: david ritchie
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: david ritchie
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Judith Evans
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Erin Holder
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: david ritchie