[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:53:22 -0800
Andy Amago wrote:
Given the surreal enormity of the chaos that [Stalin]
perpetrated on that country, I wonder if the commonly held view that
Communism was tried and failed really holds. Under circumstances such as
those, democracy/capitalism would have failed too. I am NOT a supporter of
Communism. I'm just wondering if absent Stalin it would have turned out
differently. Rhetorical. Of course it would have turned out differently.
It may have actually been a viable system. We'll never know.
Yes. Marx wouldn't have seen Stalin's rule as a dictatorship of the
proletariat, so-called. Clearly a one-man dictatorship is a long way
from a state in which the workers control the means of production, and
thereby 'state' power. But Marx was notoriously reluctant to say just
what the final stage would look like in detail, because he and Engels
(I don't know who said what) wanted to avoid the fallacy of 'utopian
socialism' in favor of 'scientific socialism.' Reaganites who see the
failure of the Soviet Union as the failure of Communism itself shouldn't
be trusted to interpret anything.
It may be that Marx didn't really think that there were logical
relations (Feudalism entails Capitalism) among objects and states of
affairs, but there's a teleological strain in his writings which
suggests that he must have; if he didn't think something like this, his
claims about the transition from one state to another would have been
put forward as empirical ones, confirmable or falsifiable through
experience.
It was this view of Marx (not necessarily this view of Marx's) that I
was interested in.
Phil Enns or Mike Chase, or both, will point out how I get Marx wrong;
Richard Henninge will point out how in criticizing Marx I misrepresent
German Idealism; Donal will take care of the falsifiability stuff.
Robert Paul
Winesburg, Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Mike Geary
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Andy Amago
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
perpetrated on that country, I wonder if the commonly held view that
Communism was tried and failed really holds. Under circumstances such as
those, democracy/capitalism would have failed too. I am NOT a supporter of
Communism. I'm just wondering if absent Stalin it would have turned out
differently. Rhetorical. Of course it would have turned out differently. It may have actually been a viable system. We'll never know.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Andy Amago