[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:40:52 -0500
Judy web mail had nothing to do with it.
> [Original Message]
> From: Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 12/10/2005 5:16:59 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
>
> Yes -- it seems it would.
>
> I take it Irene wasn't the person who could only post
> to lit-ideas using webmail?
>
> Judy Evans
> Cardiff
>
> --- JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Uh, it would have been possible for you to post
> > under the screen name of
> > Mary Poppins and in your first post say, "Hi, this
> > is Irene, posting under a
> > different screen name because of technical issues".
> > Or maybe that would have
> > been too simple.
> >
> > Julie Krueger
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new
Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Judith Evans
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: Judith Evans