[lit-ideas] How the US is losing in Iraq
- From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Lit-Ideas" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:26:59 -0700
A good set of articles in today's Washington Post on how IEDs have become
the major weapon against the US military in Iraq. Here are some quotes.
----------------
"We all drank the Kool-Aid," said a retired Army officer who worked on
counter-IED issues for three years. "We believed (...) because the United
States was the technology powerhouse, the solution to this problem would
come from science. That attitude was 'All we have to do is throw technology
at it and the problem will go away.' The day we lose a war, it will be to
guys with spears and loincloths, because they're not tied to technology. And
we're kind of close to being there."
More than 81,000 IED attacks have occurred in Iraq, including 25,000 so far
this year, according to U.S. military sources.
Bombs detonated by radio-controlled triggers, which had become the most
prominent killer of U.S. forces, today amount to only 10 percent of all IEDs
in Iraq after the deployment of 30,000 jammers, with more on the way.
The 100 or so daily IED "events" -- bombs that blow up, as well as those
discovered before they detonate -- have doubled since the 50 per day typical
in January 2006. The 3,229 IEDs recorded in March of this year put the
monthly total in Iraq above 3,000 for the first time, a threshold also
exceeded in May and June. "The numbers," one Army colonel said, "are
astonishing."
Each week, the cat-and-mouse game expanded. When coalition convoys routinely
began stopping 300 yards from a suspected IED, insurgents planted easily
spotted hoax bombs to halt traffic, then detonated explosives that had been
hidden where a convoy would most likely pull over.
--------------
How did this happen? Miscalculation. The US military is built to carry out
mechanized land war. They had no preparation to deal with a guerilla
insurgency. The Iraqi, unable to carry out a land war, developed a new
strategy based on low-level technology and local infrastructure.
As long as the US continues to drive around in vehicles, the Iraqi will use
more IEDs. The US has spent $15 billion to stop IEDs, yet the number of IED
continues to grow. The Iraqi can modify the devices faster than the US can
come up with solutions, and they can deploy these in overwhelming numbers.
How to deal with this? Change the game.
yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: How the US is losing in Iraq
- From: Lawrence Helm
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] How the US is losing in Iraq
- » [lit-ideas] Re: How the US is losing in Iraq
- » [lit-ideas] Re: How the US is losing in Iraq
- [lit-ideas] Re: How the US is losing in Iraq
- From: Lawrence Helm