[lit-ideas] Re: Honor? Charles Taylor anyone?

  • From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:32:37 -0500

Do I have to actually read the stuff? I'll be happy to speak from my prejudices.

Mike Geary
Memphis


----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:16 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Honor? Charles Taylor anyone?



As far as I know, I am the only one who has responded to John's
suggestion of working through Taylor's _Sources of the Self_.  The book
is rather intimidating, both in its size and scope, yet also quite
readable even to those who are not students of philosophy.  I would like
to encourage listers who are interested in the topic of the modern self
to consider taking part in the discussion.  My guess is that the book is
in many libraries.  Also, John has made an excellent choice in choosing
the first chapter for discussion.  It is accessible and thought
provoking.  I have asked John to hold off on the discussion so that
others can join us.  If people would like to join us, we can wait.  So
please let us know if you would like to join us.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

Phil Enns
Toronto, ON

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: