[lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:16:19 +0100
Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 9:30:13 PM, Paul Stone wrote:
PS> The other night when former President Clinton was talking to Dan Rather on
PS> 60 Minutes, he was mentioning all the things that he had been investigated
PS> for and subsequently cleared of, and when it came time to mention
PS> whitewater and the vince foster death, his [tell] lip-bite came out in full
PS> force. He even blinked and looked up and to the left. You know what a
PS> psychologist would say about that?
PS> Who conducted the Foster investigation anyway -- Arlen Spector?
(The) Kenneth Starr:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/docs/foster.htm
(and Whitewater)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/whitewater.htm
-- Best regards, Judy mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Scribe1865
- [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Stephen Straker
- [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Paul Stone
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- [lit-ideas] Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Scribe1865
- [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Stephen Straker
- [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Paul Stone