[lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:17:44 +0100
Thursday, July 1, 2004, 6:50:10 PM, JulieReneB@xxxxxxx wrote:
EY> We help arm almost all of our potential foes.
Jac> I have never been able to understand this. Is there any coherent
Jac> explanation??
You want the money, you need the money, and -- sometimes -- tactical
and strategic considerations lead you to do it.
of course when the mouse roars you may wish you hadn't done it...
--
Best regards,
Judy mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: JulieReneB
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- [lit-ideas] Re: Hitchens on Moore's flick
- From: JulieReneB