[lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger?
- From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:46:36 +0700
Robert Paul wrote: "For, in the case of Heidegger, his acceptance and support of National Socialism is not irrelevant to his work, for his work is an expression of that very sort of Fascism, indeed, so much so that without his acceptance and support of the political and social policies of such Fascism, his work would not be what it is." The problem, as I see it, is that the above is not philosophical. It may very well be true, but I can't find a way of articulating it as a philosophical point. I find no contradiction in defending Heidegger's philosophical arguments and believing he was a bastard. Sincerely, Phil Enns Yogyakarta, Indonesia ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] an onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology of the thingliness of the thing new trends in heidegger studies
- From: palma
- [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger?
- From: Walter C. Okshevsky
- [lit-ideas] an onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology of the thingliness of the thing new trends in heidegger studies
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Man, Flaubert, Kafka -- Life vs. art
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Heil Heidegger?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger?
- From: Phil Enns
- [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger?
- From: Phil Enns
- [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger?
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Man, Flaubert, Kafka -- Life vs. art
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Lawrence Helm
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Phil Enns
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - John Wager
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Robert Paul
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Walter C. Okshevsky
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Heil Heidegger? - Walter C. Okshevsky