[lit-ideas] Guest words

  • From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Lit-Ideas" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:50:25 -0700

>>  GUESTWORDS 
>>  http://www.easthamptonstar.com/20040909/col5.htm
>>  
>>  The Unfeeling President
>>  I fault this president for not knowing what death
>>  is. He does not suffer the death of our 21-year-olds
>>  who wanted to be what they could be. On the eve of
>>  D-Day in 1944 General Eisenhower prayed to God for
>>  the lives of the young soldiers he knew were going
>>  to die. He knew what death was. Even in a justifiable
>>  war, a war not of choice but of necessity, a war of
>>  survival, the cost was almost more than Eisenhower
>>  could bear.
>>   
>>  But this president does not know what death is. He
>>  hasn't the mind for it. You see him joking with the
>>  press, peering under the table for the weapons of
>>  mass destruction he can't seem to find, you see him
>>  at rallies strutting up to the stage in shirt sleeves
>>  to the roar of the carefully screened crowd, smiling
>>  and waving, triumphal, a he-man.
>>  
>>  He does not mourn. He doesn't understand why he should
>>  mourn. He is satisfied during the course of a speech
>>  written for him to look solemn for a moment and speak
>>  of the brave young Americans who made the ultimate
>>  sacrifice for their country.
>>  
>>  But you study him, you look into his eyes and know
>>  he dissembles an emotion which he does not feel in
>>  the depths of his being because he has no capacity
>>  for it. He does not feel a personal responsibility
>>  for the 1,000 dead young men and women who wanted
>>  to be what they could be.
>>  
>>  They come to his desk not as youngsters with mothers
>>  and fathers or wives and children who will suffer
>>  to the end of their days a terribly torn fabric of
>>  familial relationships and the inconsolable remembrance
>>  of aborted life . . . they come to his desk as a political
>>  liability, which is why the press is not permitted
>>  to photograph the arrival of their coffins from Iraq.
>>  
>>  How then can he mourn? To mourn is to express regret
>>  and he regrets nothing. He does not regret that his
>>  reason for going to war was, as he knew, unsubstantiated
>>  by the facts. He does not regret that his bungled
>>  plan for the war's aftermath has made of his mission-accomplished
>>  a disaster. He does not regret that, rather than controlling
>>  terrorism, his war in Iraq has licensed it. So he
>>  never mourns for the dead and crippled youngsters
>>  who have fought this war of his choice.
>>  
>>  He wanted to go to war and he did. He had not the
>>  mind to perceive the costs of war, or to listen to
>>  those who knew those costs. He did not understand
>>  that you do not go to war when it is one of the options
>>  but when it is the only option; you go not because
>>  you want to but because you have to.
>>  
>>  Yet this president knew it would be difficult for
>>  Americans not to cheer the overthrow of a foreign
>>  dictator. He knew that much. This president and his
>>  supporters would seem to have a mind for only one
>>  thing -- to take power, to remain in power, and to
>>  use that power for the sake of themselves and their
>>  friends.
>>  
>>  A war will do that as well as anything. You become
>>  a wartime leader. The country gets behind you. Dissent
>>  becomes inappropriate. And so he does not drop to
>>  his knees, he is not contrite, he does not sit in
>>  the church with the grieving parents and wives and
>>  children. He is the president who does not feel. He
>>  does not feel for the families of the dead, he does
>>  not feel for the 35 million of us who live in poverty,
>>  he does not feel for the 40 percent who cannot afford
>>  health insurance, he does not feel for the miners
>>  whose lungs are turning black or for the working people
>>  he has deprived of the chance to work overtime at
>>  time-and-a-half to pay their bills - it is amazing
>>  for how many people in this country this president
>>  does not feel.
>>  
>>  But he will dissemble feeling. He will say in all
>>  sincerity he is relieving the wealthiest 1 percent
>>  of the population of their tax burden for the sake
>>  of the rest of us, and that he is polluting the air
>>  we breathe for the sake of our economy, and that he
>>  is decreasing the quality of air in coal mines to
>>  save the coal miners' jobs, and that he is depriving
>>  workers of their time-and-a-half benefits for overtime
>>  because this is actually a way to honor them by raising
>>  them into the professional class.
>>  
>>  And this litany of lies he will versify with reverences
>>  for God and the flag and democracy, when just what
>>  he and his party are doing to our democracy is choking
>>  the life out of it.
>>  
>>  But there is one more terribly sad thing about all
>>  of this. I remember the millions of people here and
>>  around the world who marched against the war. It was
>>  extraordinary, that spontaneous aroused oversoul of
>>  alarm and protest that transcended national borders.
>>  Why did it happen? After all, this was not the only
>>  war anyone had ever seen coming. There are little
>>  wars all over he world most of the time.
>>  
>>  But the cry of protest was the appalled understanding
>>  of millions of people that America was ceding its
>>  role as the last best hope of mankind. It was their
>>  perception that the classic archetype of democracy
>>  was morphing into a rogue nation. The greatest democratic
>>  republic in history was turning its back on the future,
>>  using its extraordinary power and standing not to
>>  advance the ideal of a concordance of civilizations
>>  but to endorse the kind of tribal combat that originated
>>  with the Neanderthals, a people, now extinct, who
>>  could imagine ensuring their survival by no other
>>  means than pre-emptive war.
>>  
>>  The president we get is the country we get. With each
>>  president the nation is conformed spiritually. He
>>  is the artificer of our malleable national soul. He
>>  proposes not only the laws but the kinds of lawlessness
>>  that govern our lives and invoke our responses. The
>>  people he appoints are cast in his image. The trouble
>>  they get into and get us into, is his characteristic
>>  trouble.
>>  
>>  Finally, the media amplify his character into our
>>  moral weather report. He becomes the face of our sky,
>>  the conditions that prevail. How can we sustain ourselves
>>  as the United States of America given the stupid and
>>  ineffective warmaking, the constitutionally insensitive
>>  lawgiving, and the monarchal economics of this president?
>>  He cannot mourn but is a figure of such moral vacancy
>>  as to make us mourn for ourselves.
>>  
>>  The novelist E.L. Doctorow has a house in Sag Harbor.

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] Guest words