Not while they're hurting. Then they lash out. It's like caring about somebody while you have stomach ache or a crushed foot or something. If and when they come through the other side, then yes, it's like somebody who had a stomach ache or crushed foot can appreciate someone else's stomach ache or crushed foot. Andy --- On Tue, 8/4/09, veronica caley <molleo1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: veronica caley <molleo1@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Guess - Answer To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 12:37 AM " it's *only* hurt people who hurt people. Happy people just don't need to." My experience has been that hurt people sometimes have a higher degree of empathy. Veronica ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy To: lit-ideas Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 4:52 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Guess - Answer I'll read this later, but if we impugned everyone of good faith, which is to say motive, we'd find that most of our heroes when disrobed have very clay feet. I almost defy you to find one that has pure motives. For Veronica, I originally said [Marx] was right, and he was wrong, and I have no strong feelings one way or the other about him. I sympathize with his desire for a middle class, basically that's what he's doing, but I absolutely have no sympathy for his violent approach. Revolution is another way of spelling war. But then, people's imaginations are so limited, all they think of is violence. Even we went out and invaded Iraq; Vietnam, and on and on. Also, poor people are as greedy as rich people. Child exploitation is a horrific issue everywhere and always and is the root of all greed and evil. Capitalists were once children too, and the bad child rearing they experienced hardens them and makes them exploit the children they themselves once were. Hurt people will always hurt people and the cycle continues into forever. In fact, it's *only* hurt people who hurt people. Happy people just don't need to. For Robert, I agree. The phrase has been shortened and made almost quippy. I know translations can be tricky. I don't know German whatsoever but I know just generally speaking it's the essence, not the words that are translated. I think the essence remains of workers throwing off their chains though, don't you? Kind of a rhetorical question. Andy --- On Mon, 8/3/09, Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Guess - Answer To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 8:05 PM --- On Mon, 3/8/09, Andy <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Andy <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Guess - Answer > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Monday, 3 August, 2009, 7:24 PM > Still, even if he was assigned > the topic, it did seem to wind up as a recurring theme, > perhaps even mission for his life. Christopher > Hitchens took apart Mother Theresa. Does that mean she > wasn't sincere? Still looking for the > evidence... Link to a short piece by Prof. Flew that puts the issue of bad faith as something that can be shown by Marx's failure to take a seriously self-critical view of his own works... http://elm.eeng.dcu.ie/~tkpw/newsletter/v4n1-2/node28.html Donal ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html