[lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Why philosophy?
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:55:26 -0400
John: Clients pay for what they perceive as fresh
and original, not for what the other guy did just
the other day. A sophist I am, I embrace the role.
And I have my professional standards.
Yes, indeed. One must separate the writing one
does to pay the chichi villa's maintenance fee,
tune up the 1936 Bugati, expand the hothouse for
more orchids, etc., from the writing one does
because one must.
Which is jokey but not aimed at John. Professional
integrity trumps everything for those of us who
feel that way, and yet must earn a living by the
Word, InCopy, or by trying to be Wordperfect.
That might make us ueberhacks, or sophists with
scruples. In the pro market that's something,
because it is flooded with unscrupulous hacks,
scribes whose lance is not merely free but
completely mercenary and of polar chill.
"Let's spin Hitler's hand as the palm that reaches
to pat lovingly, not as the stiff paw that heils."
You betcha!
In solidarity,
Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why philosophy?
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Fwd: Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Fwd: Why philosophy?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Why philosophy?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Why philosophy?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Why philosophy?
- [lit-ideas] Re: Fwd: Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Why philosophy?
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Fwd: Why philosophy?
- From: John McCreery