> ck: The mess up was on the part of CBS. Fifteen years ago, almost editor I > dealt with, as a reporter, would have laughed in my face had I tried to get > a newspaper to publish an assertion from a source whose materials I could > not vouch for--in the context of ANY story. A major problem for the large news services is the web: bloggers and websites can move extremely fast. They can publish a story literally within minutes. They don't bother with nonsense such as checking the sources (or even common sense.) The Monica story, the resignation of Trent Lott (Senate Majority Leader), the Abu Ghraib the CBS forged memos: all of these stories were led by websites. CBS/NBC/ABC/CNN/WashPost/NYT have learned that if they don't break a story fast, they will be left in the dust. There's also the problem of backlash. CBS is being viciously hammered by rightwingers to fire Dan Rather. If CBS fires him, that's pretty much the end of American news. The major news media have been extremely passive and uncritical. yrs, andreas www.andreas.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html