You know, Irene I discussed these matters in a note to Eric yesterday. I didn't think it was too long for you -- not your anti-Bush and Leftist maunderings, of course, but the approach toward Iran. Vali Nasr, purported by some to be the greatest authority on political Islam implied that if we could reach an agreement with Iran, that could go a long way toward solving the Iraq problem. Iran has weight with Syria and if the two of them decided to stop the insurgency from their countries that would be a major help. Then we would need the Saudis to influence the Iraqi Sunnis and we'd be home free. Nasr said that in Iraq the Shiites trust Iran the most, the Sunnis trust the Saudis the most and the Kurds trusts the US the most. [a paraphrase from a CSPAN 2 interview with Vali Nasr in regard to his new book The Shi Revival.] Lawrence . _____ From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Amago Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 8:08 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Five Years Ago Well, how about make peace with Iran and solve the Palestinian thing. That would be huge steps forward. Iraq is dead in the water, and Iran can be a powerful ally in settling them down. From what I can tell, Iran seems to want to enter the 21st century. That's the motivation behind the desire for nuclear energy. At this point, we don't have a choice, and now Afghanistan is on the brink of going the way of Iraq. Of course we can always invade Iran and create thousands and tens of thousands more jihadists and suicide bombers. That's probably what they will do. Did you ever wonder, Lawrence, that there are no leftists among the neocons that put this fiasco together? Want to reconsider your opinion of leftists? And to think, for making such a mess, Wolfowitz was given a job running the IMF. Does that not amaze you?