[lit-ideas] Re: 'Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby'' from The Nation
- From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:17:09 -0700
I subscribe to the LRB and I read the article last week. It's something that could never be
printed in the USA. No American politician will dare to discuss it, or even mention it.
yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com
Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby'
by Philip Weiss
Intellectuals can only dream of having the impact that John Mearsheimer
and Stephen Walt have had this spring. Within hours of their publishing
a critique of the Israel lobby in The London Review of Books for March
23, the article was zinging around the world, soon to show up on the
front pages of newspapers and stir heated discussion on cable-TV shows.
Virtually overnight, two balding professors in their 50s had become
public intellectuals, ducking hundreds of e-mails, phone messages and
challenges to debate.
Titled "The Israel Lobby," the piece argued that a wide-ranging
coalition that includes neoconservatives, Christian Zionists,
leading journalists and of course the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, or AIPAC, exerts a "stranglehold" on Middle East policy and
public debate on the issue. While supporting the moral cause for the
existence of Israel, the authors said there was neither a strategic nor
a moral interest in America's siding so strongly with post-occupation
Israel. Many Americans thought the Iraq War was about oil, but "the war
was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure."
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] 'Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby'' from The Nation
- » [lit-ideas] Re: 'Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby'' from The Nation
- » [lit-ideas] Re: 'Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby'' from The Nation
Ferment Over 'The Israel Lobby' by Philip Weiss
Intellectuals can only dream of having the impact that John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt have had this spring. Within hours of their publishing a critique of the Israel lobby in The London Review of Books for March 23, the article was zinging around the world, soon to show up on the front pages of newspapers and stir heated discussion on cable-TV shows. Virtually overnight, two balding professors in their 50s had become public intellectuals, ducking hundreds of e-mails, phone messages and challenges to debate.
Titled "The Israel Lobby," the piece argued that a wide-ranging coalition that includes neoconservatives, Christian Zionists, leading journalists and of course the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, exerts a "stranglehold" on Middle East policy and public debate on the issue. While supporting the moral cause for the existence of Israel, the authors said there was neither a strategic nor a moral interest in America's siding so strongly with post-occupation Israel. Many Americans thought the Iraq War was about oil, but "the war was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure."