[lit-ideas] Re: Faith Based Bucks
- From: eternitytime1@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:03:07 -0400
Hi,
It wasn't really charity, then, was it?
Will the faith groups (esp the Red Cross) be reimbursing the public for their
funds, then?
Thanks for posting this! It will definitely generate discussion on a different
list that I'm on--we have someone who is fairly high up in the Salvation Army
on it and so it will be great to hear from that perspective (of course, the Red
Cross gave quite a bit to the Republican Party last year, though, didn't they?)
Wishing people would give freely and generously--and disliking stinginess esp
under the guise of being what they are not (though I know it is often hard to
do if you live in lack and limitation...)
Best,
Marlena
-----Original Message-----
From: M.A. Camp <macampesq@xxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:24:51 -0500
Subject: [lit-ideas] Faith Based Bucks
FEMA Plans to Reimburse Faith Groups for Aid
As Civil Libertarians Object, Religious Organizations Weigh Whether to Apply
Washington Post ^ | September 27, 2005 | Alan Cooperman and Elizabeth Williamson
After weeks of prodding by Republican lawmakers and the American Red Cross, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency said yesterday that it will use taxpayer
money to reimburse churches and other religious organizations that have opened
their doors to provide shelter, food and supplies to survivors of hurricanes
Katrina and Rita.
FEMA officials said it would mark the first time that the government has made
large-scale payments to religious groups for helping to cope with a domestic
natural disaster.
"I believe it's appropriate for the federal government to assist the faith
community because of the scale and scope of the effort and how long it's
lasting," said Joe Becker, senior vice president for preparedness and response
with the Red Cross.
Civil liberties groups called the decision a violation of the traditional
boundary between church and state, accusing FEMA of trying to restore its
battered reputation by playing to religious conservatives.
"What really frosts me about all this is, here is an administration that didn't
do its job and now is trying to dig itself out by making right-wing groups
happy," said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for
Separation of Church and State.
FEMA officials said religious organizations would be eligible for payments only
if they operated emergency shelters, food distribution centers or medical
facilities at the request of state or local governments in the three states
that have declared emergencies -- Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. In those
cases, "a wide range of costs would be available for reimbursement, including
labor costs incurred in excess of normal operations, rent for the facility and
delivery of essential needs like food and water," FEMA spokesman Eugene
Kinerney said in an e-mail.
For churches, synagogues and mosques that have taken in hurricane survivors,
FEMA's decision presents a quandary. Some said they were eager to get the money
and had begun tallying their costs, from electric bills to worn carpets. Others
said they probably would not apply for the funds, fearing donations would dry
up if the public came to believe they were receiving government handouts.
"Volunteer labor is just that: volunteer," said the Rev. Robert E. Reccord,
president of the Southern Baptist Convention's North American Mission Board.
"We would never ask the government to pay for it."
When Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, religious
charities rushed in to provide emergency services, often acting more quickly
and efficiently than the government. Relief workers in the stricken states
estimate that 500,000 people have taken refuge in facilities run by religious
groups.
In the days after the disaster, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) and
other Republicans complained that FEMA seemed reluctant to pay church groups.
"There are tons of questions about what is reimbursable, what is not
reimbursable," DeLay said Sept. 13, noting that Houston alone had "500 or 600
churches that took in evacuees, and they would get no reimbursement."
Becker said he and his staff at the Red Cross also urged FEMA to allow
reimbursement of religious groups. Ordinarily, Becker said, churches provide
shelter for the first days after a disaster, then the Red Cross takes over. But
in a storm season that has stretched every Red Cross shelter to the breaking
point, church buildings must for the first time house evacuees indefinitely.
Even so, Lynn, of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said
that federal reimbursement is inappropriate.
"The good news is that this work is being done now, but I don't think a lot of
people realize that a lot of these organizations are actively working to obtain
federal funds. That's a strange definition of charity," he said.
Lynn added that he accepts the need for the government to coordinate with
religious groups in a major disaster, but not to "pay for their good works."
"We've never complained about using a religious organization as a distribution
point for food or clothing or anything else," Lynn said. But "direct cash
reimbursements would be unprecedented."
FEMA outlined the policy in a Sept. 9 internal memorandum on "Eligible Costs
for Emergency Sheltering Declarations." Religious groups, like secular
nonprofit groups, will have to document their costs and file for reimbursement
from state and local emergency management agencies, which in turn will seek
funds from FEMA.
David Fukitomi, infrastructure coordinator for FEMA in Louisiana, said that the
organization has begun briefings for potential applicants in the disaster area
but that it is too early to know how many will take advantage of the program.
"The need was so overwhelming that the faith-based groups stepped up, and we're
trying to find a way to help them shoulder some of the burden for doing the
right thing," he said, adding that "the churches are interested" but that "part
of our effort is getting the local governments to be interested in being their
sponsor."
A spokeswoman for the Salvation Army said it has been in talks with state and
federal officials about reimbursement for the 76,000 nights of shelter it has
provided to Katrina survivors so far. But it is still unclear whether the
Salvation Army will qualify, she said.
The Rev. Flip Benham, director of Operation Save America, an antiabortion group
formerly known as Operation Rescue, said, "Separation of church and state means
nothing in a time of disaster; you see immediately what a farce it is."
Benham said that his group has been dispensing food and clothing and that
"Bibles and tracts go out with everything we put out." In Mendenhall, Miss., he
said, he preached to evacuees while the mayor directed traffic and the sheriff
put inmates from the county jail to work handing out supplies.
Yet Benham said he would never accept a dime from the federal government. "The
people have been so generous to give that for us to ask for reimbursement would
be like gouging for gas," he said. "That would be a crime against heaven."
For some individual churches, however, reimbursement is very appealing. At
Christus Victor Lutheran Church in Ocean Springs, Miss., as many as 200
evacuees and volunteer workers have been sleeping each night in the sanctuary
and Sunday school classrooms. The church's entrance hall is a Red Cross
reception area and medical clinic. As many as 400 people a day are eating in
the fellowship hall.
Suzie Harvey, the parish administrator, said the church was asked by the Red
Cross and local officials to serve as a shelter. The church's leadership agreed
immediately, without anticipating that nearly a quarter of its 650 members
would be rendered homeless and in no position to contribute funds. "This was
just something we had to do," she said. "Later we realized we have no income
coming in."
Harvey said the electric bill has skyrocketed, water is being used
round-the-clock and there has been "20 years of wear on the carpet in one
month." When FEMA makes money available, she said, the church definitely will
apply.
--
Cheers,
M.A. Camp, Esq.
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Faith Based Bucks
- From: John Wager
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Faith Based Bucks
- From: M.A. Camp
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Faith Based Bucks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Faith Based Bucks
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Faith Based Bucks
- [lit-ideas] Re: Faith Based Bucks
- From: John Wager
- [lit-ideas] Faith Based Bucks
- From: M.A. Camp