[lit-ideas] Re: FW: Still needing a definition
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:38:26 -0500
I am uncommonly busy at the moment and this is distracting me. I'll see if
I can come up with something later. In meantime, I invite you also to
answer my questions with something more than pie in the sky. I really have
to finish what I'm doing.
> [Original Message]
> From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 12/29/2005 3:33:28 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Still needing a definition
>
> Irene wrote:
>
> > There are a precious few good human parents out there.
>
> This follows, I suppose, from your tiresome indictment of humanity in
> general?? There are few (if any) decent human beings; therefore, being
> in various ways defective, they must have been made so by their parents.
> Is that it? Or have you actually done some empirical investigation, as
> might a sociologist? Maybe this is somehow known to you a priori. I'm
> not sure what set you off on your latest series of misanthropic rants,
> but I genuinely hope you feel better soon.
>
> Robert Paul
> Reed College
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
