[lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- From: Eternitytime1@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:29:09 EDT
In a message dated 7/31/2005 12:23:01 PM Central Daylight Time,
aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
It doesn't change that if you take off the external controls, the evil flows
Hi, Andy,
I really sometimes think you don't read much of what I write <wry look>
given the group(s) you tend to put me in...but that's okay. Given a situation
that my son is dealing with because of the lack of association in that sort of
group, it is a bit ironic--and I'm not good with irony so I'll just use it as
an opportunity for personal growth and development <wry look>. (don't
worry--I'll spare you the details!)
The point I was trying to make (in my wordy way <sigh>) was that just
because there is a moral law within does not mean that everyone studies it.
And, so--perhaps the external controls put on those who do not study it
were, actually, created by those who HAVE done so.
After all--if no one studied the moral law within, and thus only Evil
Behavior reigned...why would anyone ever have set up the first external law to
reign in such behavior?
*someone* did that--and perhaps it was the first ones who dug deep within...
Waiting for the Sunday poem(s),
Marlena in Missouri
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- From: Erin Holder
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- » [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- » [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- » [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- » [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- » [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- [lit-ideas] Re: FW: Re: gashlycrumb tinies
- From: Erin Holder