[lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- From: "John McCreery" <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:23:20 +0900
On 3/28/07, Erin Holder <erin.holder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK
I'm done.
Not without explaining how Sartre got Heidegger wrong. Ignorant but
inquiring minds want to know.
John
--
John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
Tel. +81-45-314-9324
http://www.wordworks.jp/
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- From: wokshevs
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Existential Madlibs
- From: Erin Holder
- [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- From: Erin Holder
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
OK I'm done.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Existential Madlibs
- From: Erin Holder
- [lit-ideas] Re: Existential Madlibs
- From: Erin Holder