--- wokshevs@xxxxxx wrote: > Fascinating. Habermas is one of the greatest Kantian > philosophers alive today. > What is it about his writings that would help put > somebody to sleep? (I assume > that's the relevant sleep disorder you have in > mind.) In other words, what kind > of philosophical interests in the area of practical > reason would one have to > have in order to find Habermas soporifically > uninteresting? > Cheers, Walter *Well, I for one don't see how the Kantian distinction between public and private reason, as presented in What is Englightenment, has any usefulness to understanding or evaluating moral actions. How does it make sense to posit that an officer commanding thousands of men is acting as 'a private individual' while on duty, but as a public individual when he is writing a letter to a newspaper. Or a priest giving a sermon to hundreds is acting as 'a private individual,' while he is being a public personality when he expresses his views in some other venue. The distinction between public and private morality seems to boil down to saying that one needs to switch off his moral conscience when doing the job he is paid for. Such a separation seems to me to be akin to hypocrisy, and understandably difficult to impose on any moral paradigm (including religious) that takes itself seriously. Walter and Phil will no doubt correct me on this, although I have to say that I am less interested in a long lecture on what Kant or Habermas really wanted to say and where, and more in how these ideas are pertinent. O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html