On 2005/01/18, at 19:24, Robert Paul wrote: > "Perhaps the immobility of the things that surround us is forced upon > them by > our conviction that they are themselves, and not anything else, _and_ > by the > immobility of our conceptions of them." Conception? Or perception? Is it not a principal lesson of modern science that what we take to be immobility is only change at a pace to slow for unaided perception to grasp. John McCreery ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html