If we held that > people had to live according to what they say, 'Andy' would have been > sent packing. Please explain. > [Original Message] > From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 4/2/2006 1:12:11 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Eric's hypocritcal wars > > Andreas Ramos: > > > "But to argue that he can say whatever he wants yet not act upon it, and > we should honor that?" > > Again, nonsense. This is an email list and none, or perhaps only a few, > know each other in any meaningful way. There is the danger of > developing a sort of misplaced concreteness to these relationships so > that one has the illusion that we actually know each other well enough > to make personal comments. We don't, so we shouldn't. If we held that > people had to live according to what they say, 'Andy' would have been > sent packing. This is only an email list and the rules of concrete > relationships don't apply because the full range of social interactions > is lacking. We should expect each other to be, at the very least, civil > and follow the written and unwritten rules of the list. Making abusive > personal references threatens the civility of this list. Perhaps some > people are willing to sacrifice civility for ideology but I am not. > Civility is the ground of all political and social discourse and to > threaten it is to undermine the discourse itself. In short, if two or > three people agree that civility can be dispensed with for some higher > good, then this list cannot function as it was intended. > > > Sadly, > > Phil Enns > Toronto, ON > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html