[lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- From: Brian <cabrian@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:58:26 -0500
I don't think you'll find much in there that hasn't been hashed out
in other books. Since the book is basically a compilation of
Podhoretz's columns they show him to be a stalwart defender of the
Bush Doctrine from early on. But if you haven't read Lawrence Wright
or Mark Steyn or Lawrence Kaplan or Thomas Barnett I think World War
IV is a fine little volume on what we face. Just not in the Top 5.
Best,
Brian
On Sep 26, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Lawrence Helm wrote:
Actually, I'm not running across much that I haven't read elsewhere
or thought about, but Podhoretz writes well. And yes, the Bush
doctrine compares well with the Truman Doctrine.
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Defining the enemy
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- From: Brian
- [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- From: Lawrence Helm
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Defining the enemy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- [lit-ideas] Defining the enemy
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- From: Brian
- [lit-ideas] Re: Defining the enemy
- From: Lawrence Helm