> Okay, the long version: I already got that. *My* long version: I have no objection to people posting anonymously. (EOLV) Judy Evans, Cardiff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:40 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Coming and Going > Okay, the long version: > > David Savory posted a photo identifying himself as just "David" even though > there are two David's on Lit-Ideas. Some of us were confused. Someone, not > me, posted a comment under the picture "David S?" I assumed David Savory > but then saw some notes in which I saw a subtle (imagined subtlety I > suppose) reference to the photo having instead been posted by David Ritchie. > > > It was confusing for someone to post a photo identifying himself merely as > "David" when there are two David's on Lit-Ideas. > > However, some people, more than one, posted photos and merely identified > themselves as "me." In the former case we knew that "David" was one of two > David's. But who is the "me"? Anyone on Lit-Ideas could be "me." > > So I said that "David" did better than "me." We have a better chance of > guessing who "David" is than "me." > > Lawrence > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html