[lit-ideas] Re: Cindy bites yer legs

Except that you impugned Cindy's motives as mother using her son for political 
purposes and her son's motives for enlisting as a reaction to her.  That's 
unrelated to parenting?  The amazing neocon ability to look at something and 
say it's not happening.  How does one fix something that's not happening?  
Answer is, one doesn't, one can't, and here we are, doing great in Iraq 
(McCain), not teetering on the verge of bankruptcy and severe recession, 
possibly depression, daddy can do no wrong, everything just hunky dory.  If it 
ain't broke, don't fix it.  Your post wasn't about parenting issues.  Got it.  


--- On Sat, 9/27/08, Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Cindy bites yer legs
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008, 7:26 PM

ANDY: So you're saying patriotic behavior is the result 
of bad parenting?


No, I'm stating that one must always pay attention to 
motives, whether the motive is Cindy Sheehan's motives 
and their implications for her manifesto, Andy's 
motives for always seeking explanations in bad 
parenting ... or for that matter, my motives for 
looking at motives.

It seems much more interesting that way.

Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: