[lit-ideas] Re: Boot and Hanson
- From: Andy Amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:32:09 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
So you don't have a problem that the American troops were badly equipped? Made
you smile even. Weird, but interesting. You also don't say what you think of
the fact that the Israeli populace supported the war but they lost anyway.
Does that make you smile too?
-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Feb 6, 2007 7:19 PM
>To: Lit-Ideas <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [lit-ideas] Boot and Hanson
>
>In response to, "More aggressive tactics would have had a better chance
>of defeating the insurgency"
>
>
>Andy wrote, "By which he means, of course, giving the guys body armor,
>etc. Rumsfeld pushed for the low number of troops. Popular opinion has
>to run this war?"
>
>
>What a wonderful reply! Such spectacular cognitive leaps and
>seemingly-random brain templates originally led me to assume that "Andy"
>was a robot or some form of AI signed on to the List. Maybe "Andy" is a
>collaboration, political speculation formed by exquisite corpse?
>
>Replies like these used to make me crazy. Now that I am crazy, they just
>make me smile.
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
>digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
