[lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 16:28:04 -0500
At 04:19 PM 11/4/2004, you wrote:
> >Is it REALLY because you think I'm not being honest with my inquiry?<
>
>My objection wasn't that it was dishonest but that as originally worded it was
>incoherent. Now, in your latest post you imply that there _could_ be no
>logical
>(or any other) grounds for religious belief; it would hardly be surprising if
>people saw this as a pugnacious way of doing sociology.
Damn, that's the third time today someone's called me pugnacious. I really
have to take some time off.
paul
##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- From: Robert Paul
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- [lit-ideas] Re: Bizarre Faith
- From: Robert Paul