[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)

From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:12:34 -0500

>>Given that Michelangeli believed that he could'transcendentally' affect the quality of the sound of thenotes once he had played them, one wonders on whatcharacteristics such testimonial was based.

Well you know Bechsteins have that zooming golden soundopening up, whereas Steinways are more steel and velvet darkwood rooted in earth.

People who gloss over Michelangeli as a control freak don'trealize how he controlled every onstage gesture, everyaspect of his personal appearance--and restricted hisrepertoire only to those pieces he played perfectly. Theultimate artistic fussbudget...


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

References:

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
From: Donal McEvoy

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
From: joerg benesch

[lit-ideas] Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: Chris Bruce

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: joerg benesch

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: John McCreery

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: joerg benesch

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: Eric Yost

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: Chris Bruce

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)

Other related posts: