[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)

From: "John McCreery" <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:51:35 +0900

On 11/27/06, joerg benesch <jgruel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A bit anal, as Poppa Freud might say?

John

>
I'd suggest we better leave it at this point and stop inquiring into the
- er - internal depths of the master's polemics. Let's say he found this
way of reasoning a bit disappetizing.

Joerg,

from Suebia
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html



--
John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
http://www.wordworks.jp/
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Follow-Ups:

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
From: joerg benesch

References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
  - From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
  - From: joerg benesch
- [lit-ideas] Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
  - From: Chris Bruce
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
  - From: joerg benesch

Other related posts:

» [lit-ideas] Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)

Browse lit-ideas