[lit-ideas] Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- From: Chris Bruce <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:23:13 +0100
On 24. Nov 2006, at 21:28, joerg benesch wrote:
A definition? you serious? Sir, you must have been delivered The Wrong
Box ...
Isn't there a novel by that name co-written by Robert Louis Stevenson?
I can't remember - what was in it (i.e., the 'wrong box')?
... this mail came from Suebia, home of Hoelderlin & Hegel ("Ich
jedenfalls habe nie etwas so Flaches gedacht...") ...
Or elsewhere (i.e., in his aphorisms): "Ich wenigstens habe nie so
plattes Zeug gedacht." For the rest of us:
Regarding historical logic: We are assured
that we make the judgement: Gold is yellow.
This assurance is probable. But not so
equally probable is [the assurance that] we
conclude: all human beings are mortal;
Gaius is a human being; therefore he is
mortal. I at least have never thought such
dull rubbish. It is supposed to occur
internally, without our being conscious of
it. Of course, many things occur internally,
e.g. the production of urine, and something
even worse; but when that is externalized,
we hold our nose. Likewise with such
conclusions.
(There is a bit of wordplay on the verb 'schliessen' - here: 'to
conclude' - and the German word for the anal sphincter:
'Schliessmuskel', which is beyond my - here hastily exercised -
translation skills. Perhaps another list member ....)
Chris Bruce
Kiel, Germany
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- From: joerg benesch
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
- From: joerg benesch
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Hegel (and further back to Aristotle)
- From: joerg benesch
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
- From: Donal McEvoy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
- From: joerg benesch