[lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: Andy <min.erva@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Can the philosophical proposition lie in the spirit of something? Isn't that
point of philosophy, or is philosophy just isms unrelated to reality? It seems
to me that From Here to Eternity captured some of what John wrote below. But
then maybe that's why I'm not a philosopher.
wokshevs@xxxxxx wrote:
Would there be any philosophical propositions in any of the below for us to
critically consider?
Walter O.
Quoting John McCreery :
>
> As for why am I bothering to write to this list? Auerbach's central thesis,
> that the Western tradition is an amalgam of a classic, Greco-Roman desire
> for clarity and a Judaeo-Christian focus on moral struggle in the face of
> the unknowable strikes me as a theme that might become an interesting
> thread.
>
> Thoughts? Comments? Anyone?
>
> John
> --
> John McCreery
> The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
> Tel. +81-45-314-9324
> http://www.wordworks.jp/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
---------------------------------
Special deal for Yahoo! users & friends - No Cost. Get a month of Blockbuster
Total Access now
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: John McCreery
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: wokshevs
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: wokshevs