[lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: Ursula Stange <Ursula@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:10:01 -0400
It certainly used to encompass them all...pprobably still does. When
the literary critics figure out how to solve their problems with
experiments and equations, they will peel themsleves away for good and
all. Until then, they're undisciplined philosophers focusing their
undisciplined magnifying glasses on literature (which I think some of
them don't even really like).
Ursula,
not reading carefully and probably on the wrong soapbox...
in North Bay (newly covered with snow this morning...aaargh)
John McCreery wrote:
But what distinguishes philosophy from other activities that also deal
with difficult problems outside the scope of physical science or
mathematics? History has been mentioned. What of literary criticism,
anthropology, politics, marketing, haute cuisine, therapy, jazz or
art, for example? Life appears to be full of difficult problems that
do not lend themselves to performing experiments or solving equations.
Does philosophy encompass them all?
John
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: John McCreery
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: Andy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: John McCreery
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
John
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: Andy
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Auerbach on Mimesis
- From: John McCreery