[lit-ideas] Re: Arthur Herman on Iraq
- From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:02:58 -0500
Of course we can win militarily. We could have won in Korea militarily. We
could have won in Vietnam militarily. We can win in Iraq militarily. We've
got the bomb (tens of thousands of 'em). We can kill the whole fucking,
goddamn earth if we want to. We the man! But here's the rub. We had no legal
or moral right to be in Vietnam (Korea's muddier). We were the aggressor in
Vietnam (taking over from the French), and we have no legal or moral right to
be in Iraq. We are the aggressor. WE MUST NOT WIN could be the conclusion of
any legalist or moralist with integrity. Fortunately, I have no integrity --
mostly because I don't want to end up on one of our beloved government's
SUSPECTED TERRORIST LISTS and lose all my customers. God bless America!
The War In Algeria was France's darkest hour. So far it's a toss up between
Vietnam and Iraq which is the darkest of America dark hours (internationally,
that is -- domestically, slavery's a pitch dark hour, legal segregation, a
midnight dark hour). We've already descended into the moral depravity of the
French in Algeria. Hopefully, if we haven't already, we won't become the new
standard of barbarity. Get us out NOW!
Mike Geary
Memphis
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 10:32 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Arthur Herman on Iraq
Arthur Herman, author of the excellent piece "Getting Serious About Iran: A
Military Option," has a new article called "How To Win In Iraq, And How To
Lose" in the April issue of Commentary. It has been posted to OpinionJournal
and is well worth reading. He argues that
...the historical record is clear. The roots of failure in fighting
insurgencies like the one in Iraq are not military. To the contrary, Western
militaries have shown remarkable skill in learning and relearning the crucial
lessons of how to prevail against unconventional foes, and tremendous bravery
in fighting difficult and unfamiliar battles. If Iraq fails, the cause will
have to be sought elsewhere.
He goes on to liken our present experience with the one the French had in in
Algeria, where a mobile insurgency caused chaos and loss of face over and over
until the French changed their tactics and put the insurgents on the defensive.
He cites David Galula with the tactics that eventually broke the back of the
insurgents and notes that while Galula's book Counterinsurgency Warfare was
virtually unknown two years ago, it is now "the bible of American
counterinsurgency thinkers like Gen. Petraeus, whose field manual it largely
informs."
Good stuff. Read it.
Brian
Birmingham, AL
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Arthur Herman on Iraq
- From: Andreas Ramos
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Arthur Herman on Iraq
- From: Brian
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Arthur Herman on Iraq
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Arthur Herman on Iraq
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Arthur Herman on Iraq
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Arthur Herman on Iraq
- [lit-ideas] Re: Arthur Herman on Iraq
- From: Andreas Ramos
- [lit-ideas] Arthur Herman on Iraq
- From: Brian