[lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:49:48 -0800
Mike Geary quotes Paul Stone:
the person in question wrote "it was "me" ", in which case the "me"
becomes a noun, NOT a pronoun and therefore is perfectly grammatically
correct.
And replies:
No wonder Canada's not a superpower with thinking like that running
rampant. "Me" is a noun? Indeed! Hocus pocus, dominocus, you're a
noun, ta-da! Thank God I live in the USA, where nouns are nouns and
pronouns are pronouns. God is in His heaven and all is rightwing with
the world.
Paul Stone has a pretty good case. Mike's use of double quotes to mark
off 'me' suggests that he's using 'me' as a name (compare 'using me as a
name'), which, if you think proper names are nouns, implies that Mike is
clearing things up by renaming himself. That proper names are nouns is
another fallacy but it's one accepted by grammarians for government work.
Robert Paul
Department of Semantic Ontology
Mutton College
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
