[lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:49:48 -0800
Mike Geary quotes Paul Stone:
the person in question wrote "it was "me" ", in which case the "me"
becomes a noun, NOT a pronoun and therefore is perfectly grammatically
correct.
And replies:
No wonder Canada's not a superpower with thinking like that running
rampant. "Me" is a noun? Indeed! Hocus pocus, dominocus, you're a
noun, ta-da! Thank God I live in the USA, where nouns are nouns and
pronouns are pronouns. God is in His heaven and all is rightwing with
the world.
Paul Stone has a pretty good case. Mike's use of double quotes to mark
off 'me' suggests that he's using 'me' as a name (compare 'using me as a
name'), which, if you think proper names are nouns, implies that Mike is
clearing things up by renaming himself. That proper names are nouns is
another fallacy but it's one accepted by grammarians for government work.
Robert Paul
Department of Semantic Ontology
Mutton College
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Lloyd Mitchell
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Eric Yost
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Poem
- From: Phil Enns
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Poem
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Poem
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Mike Geary
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
the person in question wrote "it was "me" ", in which case the "me" becomes a noun, NOT a pronoun and therefore is perfectly grammatically correct.
And replies:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Lloyd Mitchell
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Eric Yost
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Poem
- From: Phil Enns
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Poem
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday Poem
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Robert Paul
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Ursula Stange
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Anonymity and revelation...
- From: Mike Geary