[lit-ideas] Re: Ahmadi-Nejad's Letter to Bush

Of course it's relevant, unless one wants to be hypocritical.   


> [Original Message]
> From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 5/12/2006 8:56:21 AM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Ahmadi-Nejad's Letter to Bush
>
> Mike Geary wrote:
>
> "Oh, Christ, please, Phil, let's not get into a tit-for-tat on criminals
> that the U. S. has supported compared to criminals Iran has supported,
> you would slink away in shame.  I like you, I don't want to have to do
> that to you."
>
> I am glad to hear you don't want to because there would be no reason to.
> The discussion was about Iran so I would find it a bit odd if you
> started talking about the US.  My interest in and connection to Iran has
> nothing to do with the US so I don't see why I should be interested in
> the criminals the US has supported.  You do know that not everything is
> about the US, right?  It is possible and perfectly reasonable to have a
> discussion regarding the threat of Iran and not have to mention the US.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Phil Enns
> Toronto, ON
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: