Of course it's relevant, unless one wants to be hypocritical. > [Original Message] > From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 5/12/2006 8:56:21 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Ahmadi-Nejad's Letter to Bush > > Mike Geary wrote: > > "Oh, Christ, please, Phil, let's not get into a tit-for-tat on criminals > that the U. S. has supported compared to criminals Iran has supported, > you would slink away in shame. I like you, I don't want to have to do > that to you." > > I am glad to hear you don't want to because there would be no reason to. > The discussion was about Iran so I would find it a bit odd if you > started talking about the US. My interest in and connection to Iran has > nothing to do with the US so I don't see why I should be interested in > the criminals the US has supported. You do know that not everything is > about the US, right? It is possible and perfectly reasonable to have a > discussion regarding the threat of Iran and not have to mention the US. > > > Sincerely, > > Phil Enns > Toronto, ON > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html