[lit-ideas] Re: Agnotology
- From: palma <palma@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:20:52 -0400 (EDT)
from distant memories and half baked insights, it &may& follow
if J&T&B are taken to be essentially a matter of a conscious state of
believing, if os one may be willing to claim that being conscious of a
belief is to know that one knows (this is dave rosenthal view, e.g.)
in sum
I know [that p]
requires
that
p is true
I possess a justification of the belief [that p]
I believe[that p]
coupled with a HOT theory of consciousness, I get the required thorem,
or allegedlet Hintikka's theorem
On
Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Donal McEvoy wrote:
--- On Tue, 19/4/11, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Indeed, Hintikka, in his "Logic of Knowledge" proposes
to call "Socrates"
-- 'the agnotological agent'.
For Hintikka, it is a theorem:
If S knows that p, S knows that he knows that p.
Speaking off the cuff, if this is what Hintikka says, it seems wrong to me: either the
"knows" is a redundancy (with no secondary meaning) or it is a meta-knowing - a
higher level knowing that pertains to some lower level knowledge about p.
It does not obviously follow, even within a subjectivist theory like 'epistemic
logic', that because 'I know p' I am further aware of having knowledge that 'I
know p' beyond the mere fact of having a mental state that might be described
as 'I know p'. There is an infinite regress looming otherwise: for surely then
if 'I know p' entails 'I know that I know p' it also entails 'I know that I
know that I know p' etc.; and yet 'I know p' is surely a finite mental state
and not one that spins off into infinity.
What might be argued is that I cannot claim both that 'I know p' and that 'I
know that I do not know p'. But this would not mean that 'I know p' entails
some further knowing-state only that it rules out as a further knowing-state
one that it is inconsistent with it. In fact, this is arguably true if we
substitute 'believe' for 'know': I cannot at the same time both 'believe p' and
'believe that I do not believe p'.
Where does this get us though?
Btw, Hintikka is also a defender of inductive logic isn't he? Also btw, for Popper
"epistemic logic" is a subjectivist blunder in the theory of knowledge: largely
irrelevant and point-missing. Btw, so is 'inductive logic' mostly.
Donal
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
/begin/read__>sig.file: postal address
palma
University of KwaZulu-Natal Philosophy
3rd floor of Memorial Tower Building
Howard College Campus
Durban 4041
South Africa
Tel off: [+27] 031 2601591 (sec: Mrs. Yolanda Hordyk) [+27] 031-2602292
Fax [+27] 031-2603031
mobile 07 62 36 23 91 calling from overseas +[27] 76 2362391
EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxx
EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxxxx
MY OFFICE IS @Mtb
*only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod
29 rue d'Ulm
f-75005 paris france
________
This e-mail message (and attachments) is confidential, and/or privileged and is
intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail
you must not copy,
distribute, take any action in reliance on it or disclose it to anyone. Any
confidentiality or
privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.
This entity is not responsible for any information not related to the business
of this entity. If you
received this e-mail in error please destroy the original and notify the sender.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio, enim, nisi judex universalis esse deberet, frustra singulis datur.
[ _Quaestiones Naturales_, Adelard of Bath ]
Signora granda, testa che massa
massa ne passa, che quasi schissa,
Dia dei sostegni de cese e palassi
Dia de le taje che su ne tien fissi
Dia de le onde che le ne fa grassi,
ne ingrassa de ogni grassia, Dia Venessia -
aàh Venessia aàh Venàssia aàh Venùsia
Andrea Zanzotto, Filò, (Sezione: Recitativo Veneziano)
Other related posts: