[lit-ideas] Re: 2006 reading lists

  • From: "Stan Spiegel" <writeforu2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:07:20 -0500

My reading list for 2005 is a mishmash of this and that:

As a short story fan, some of the better short story collections were:
* David Means, "The Secret Goldfish"
* Annie Proulx, "Bad Dirt" - a very idiosyncratic (and memorable) approach to 
storytelling
* Julie Orringer, "How to Breathe Underwater" - really magnificent stories by a 
new young writer
* John O'Hara, "Pipe Night" - dated but still fun to read 
* Roald Dahl, "Switch Bitch" - a compelling writer with a sexually perverted 
mind who knows how to grab the reader and not let go. Reading him is very 
nourishing. His children's books are just as unpredictable and rewarding.

As a writer myself I read and re-read these for therapy 
* Ralph Keyes, "The Courage to Write"
* Raymond Obstfeld, "Fiction First Aid: Instant Remedies for Novels, Stories & 
Scripts"

As a lover of Westerns, I came upon and relished:
* Robert B. Parker, "Gunman's Rhapsody" - a retelling of the Wyatt Earp story

As a partisan Democrat I read:
* David Corn, "The Lies of George W. Bush" - very painful to read
* Al Franken, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair & Balanced Look 
at the Right" - a very funny perspective. His portrait of Barbara Bush at the 
end is worth the price of the book.

As a geriatric case going through cognitive decline, I'm still reading and 
re-reading:
* Ray Sahelian, M.D., "Mind Boosting Secrets: Natural Supplements that Enhance 
Your Mind, Memory and Mood" - an excellent book that gives systematic guidance 
on how to slow down the rapid onslaught of Alzheimers

As a sales person and direct mail copywriter always struggling to improve my 
Machiavellian skills:
* John Fenton, "Close! Close! Close! How to Make the Sale"
* Jay Levinson, "Guerrilla Marketing Handbook."
* Robert Bly, "The Copywriter's Handbook"

As a Jew interested in Israel and my own Jewishness:
* Michael Oren, "Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle 
East."
* Anton LaGuardia, " War without End: Israelis, Palestinians and the Struggle 
for a Promised Land."

New Books just bought:
* Azar Nafisi, "Reading Lolita in Tehran" - What a group of young Iranian women 
learned about the liberating effects of literature, something forbidden in Iran.
* Howard Gardner, "Extraordinary Minds: Portraits of 4 Exceptional Individuals 
and An Examination of Our Own Extraordinariness"

Stan Spiegel
Portland, ME



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Eternitytime1@xxxxxxx 
  To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 12:31 AM
  Subject: [lit-ideas] 2006 reading lists


  Hi,
  Well, changing the subject a bit, I will ask:

  What were some of the books you read in 2005?

  and the...was there a political or philosophical book that influenced your 
thinking during this past year?  Or, were you introduced to a new way of thing?

  I cannot answer now as I am too busy thinking about what Bush is reading <wry 
look> as well as reading about the founding folk belief systems of those who 
were involved in the US Constitution. However, since it is the 300th birthday 
year of Ben Franklin, I am planning on several books about him this year. Any 
ideas on which ones to focus?

  Best,
  Marlena in Missouri

  http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=31601

  POLITICS-US:
  Anti-Imperialists Beware - Bush Is Reading Again
  Analysis by Jim Lobe 

  WASHINGTON, Dec 28 (IPS) - The Reader-in-Chief is at it again, and 
anti-imperialists around the world have reason to be concerned. 

  According to the White House, U.S. President George W. Bush has taken two 
books with him to Texas for his holiday reading, which he will presumably 
indulge between his favourite ranch pursuits -- clearing brush and biking. 

  The first is about his most admired role model, Theodore Roosevelt, the other 
on the wonders being achieved by U.S. soldiers around the world. 

  The choices are not unimportant. Indeed, Bush is known to read so little -- 
both for official business and for diversion -- and to be so impressed by the 
few books he does read that it is imperative for people who are paid to know 
what's happening in Washington to find out what's on the president's nightstand 
when he turns out the light. 

  As the U.S. was gearing up for war in Iraq in the summer of 2002, for 
example, reporters noticed that Bush had tucked under his arm a rather 
scholarly -- and hence unlikely -- book, "Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen 
and Leadership in Wartime", a book by Elliot Cohen, a neo-conservative military 
historian and friend of then-Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz 

  The book argued that great civilian leaders, including Abraham Lincoln, 
Winston Churchill and Georges Clemenceau, made far better commanders than the 
generals who demanded that they be given a free hand in conducting the war. It 
was perfectly timed for persuading Bush to stand up to the recommendations of 
the top brass that he deploy far more troops to invade and occupy Iraq than 
what Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld and prominent neo-conservatives were 
calling for. 

  Similarly, Bush was given a copy of right-wing Israeli politician and former 
Soviet political prisoner Natan Sharansky's "The Case for Democracy: The Power 
of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror" immediately after its publication in 
late 2004, and was so impressed by its argument for an aggressive pro-democracy 
policy in the Arab world that the White House asked the author to interrupt a 
book tour for a personal visit. "I'm already halfway through your book," 
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reportedly told Sharansky when he showed up 
the next day. "Do you know why I'm reading it? I'm reading it because the 
president is reading it, and it's my job to know what the president is 
thinking." Passages in the book were subsequently incorporated into Bush's 2004 
inaugural address. It is in this context that Bush's latest selections should 
be analysed. The first, "When Trumpets Call: Theodore Roosevelt After the White 
House", concerns his favourite presidential antecedent, whose famous or 
infamous 1904 Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine shortly after the 
Spanish-American War heralded Washington's claim to great-power status and its 
right to intervene unilaterally anywhere in the Americas against "chronic 
wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of 
civilised society". 

  The choice may suggest that Bush, who clearly subscribes to the "great man" 
theory of history that was the rage in Roosevelt's time, is contemplating a 
very active retirement. If it doesn't take him on safari in Africa or on 
scientific expeditions to the Amazon (unlikely pastimes for a man who by all 
accounts is an unenthusiastic and incurious traveler), it could make him a 
permanent force in the Republican Party and for the kind of aggressive 
nationalism that Roosevelt espoused through much of his career. 

  The second book on Bush's reading list, "Imperial Grunts: The American 
Military on the Ground" by Robert Kaplan is far more worrisome in its 
implications, at least for the remaining three years of his presidency. 

  Kaplan, who began his career as a self-described "travel writer" in the 
1980s, has evolved into a political thinker whose outlook is explicitly 
imperialist -- a term that he has used and re-used in recent years with 
unabashed approval -- and, in the words of one conservative reviewer and 
retired Army colonel, Andrew Bacevich, "reactionary". 

  In his view (and one that would be shockingly familiar to Roosevelt in his 
"Rough Riding" days in Cuba more than 100 years ago), the "war on terror" and 
associated conflicts is simply a repeat of the U.S. Army's Indian Wars, but on 
a nearly planetary scale. 

  Instead of the Great Plains and western reaches of the 19th century U.S., 
however, today's "Injun Country", as Kaplan calls it, consists of the entire 
Islamic world, from the southern Philippines to Mauritania, as well as other 
un-governed or misgoverned areas in desperate need of order and civilisation. 

  And who best to civilise these places and their inhabitants than the U.S. 
military, specifically the "imperial grunts" with whom Kaplan embedded himself 
-- no doubt with the enthusiastic support of the Pentagon and probably Rumsfeld 
himself -- for weeks at a time in various parts of the world on three 
continents, and who, not incidentally, bear a striking resemblance to Bush's 
own self-image? 

  In contrast to the "elites" and "global cosmopolitans" who dominate the 
media, the State Department, Washington think tanks and academia, and the 
Democratic Party, these soldiers are "people who hunted, drove pickups, 
employed profanities as a matter of dialect, and yet had a literal, 
demonstrable belief in the Almighty", according to Kaplan. 

  He offers remarkable praise for the war-fighting traditions of "the gleaming 
officers corps of the Confederacy" -- that is, the military arm of the 
slave-owning southern states, including Bush's Texas, during the Civil War -- 
and for the present-day "martial evangelicalism of the South". 

  In a "Hobbesian world" where U.S. military commands and deployments span 
every continent, U.S. imperialism is not a choice, but rather a necessity, just 
as it was for the British in the late 19th century, according to Kaplan, who 
argues that Washington's "righteous responsibility (is) to advance the 
boundaries of free society and good government into zones of sheer chaos". 

  In one telling piece of analysis, he describes the presumed thoughts of a 
Filipino in Zamboanga, presumably a descendant of Moro who resisted, at the 
cost of tens of thousands of their lives, U.S. imperialism 100 years ago: "His 
smiling, naïve eyes cried out for what we in the West call colonialism." 

  With a message like that, it's not difficult to imagine Bush, who has met 
with Kaplan at least once before in the White House, requesting a return visit, 
in which case it may be useful to review the kinds of policy recommendations he 
is likely to make. 

  A U.S. withdrawal from Iraq now, Kaplan has predicted, would result in a 
"real bloodbath" and a reversal of liberalisation in the Arab world, including 
the reconstitution of Lebanon by the Syrians "in their own totalitarian image". 

  He has also cautioned against China's growing political and economic clout in 
the world. "Unless we begin military cooperation with Indonesia, for instance, 
at some point the Indonesian military will be captured by the Chinese in some 
form." ***** 

Other related posts: