Questo sembra un caso di studio concreto e interessante:
https://fsfe.org/fi/projects/libreoffice/Web%20version%20with%20notes%20-%20Dirty%20tactics%20against%20LibreOffice%20in%20public%20administration,%20and%20how%20to%20overcome%20them.pdf
"If others where to follow this example, public agencies in Europe could save
70 % on their office software costs on a very quick schedule, and without
any drawbacks. The ministry did not give up on anything, they just
switched to another software that is equally good or in some ways even
superior. For example LibreOffice natively uses an ISO-standardized file
format that is guaranteed to still be accessible in 20 or 50 years time,
which is a significant feature not available in current Microsoft Office.
Yes, Microsoft has tried to give the impression that they would also offer that
feature, but no version released to date follows the Microsoft OOXML
standard, and anyways the standard allows embedded binaries and other
creepy features, so even if they where to follow the standard they've
written, it allows them to do documents that cannot be fully opened using
the information written in the standard."
Aspetti non da poco.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 7:57 AM, Diego Maniacco <diego.maniacco@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In sintesi leggo che il capo del reparto IT di Munich non vede motivo alcuno
per abbandonare LiMux.
Pare quindi un articolo positivo.
diego
---------------------------------------
Diego Maniacco, Bolzano (Italy)
diego.maniacco@xxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------
--
Per iscriversi (o disiscriversi), basta spedire un messaggio con OGGETTO
"subscribe" (o "unsubscribe") a mailto:linuxtrent-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
