[LRflex] Re: two more
- From: Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:10:08 -0800
on 3/29/06 8:16 PM, Robert O. SHAW at rj5s@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Doug:
>
> A confession; I've honestly tried to do a little work with birds. I love
> them. They are howevere very difficult subjects, any way you wish to
> measure the degree of difficulty. this is especially ru if one really cares
> about their work.
>
> Clearly, you continue to refine your technique with superb results. These
> are very crisp, revealing exposures that still show the "personality" of the
> subject. Really well done.
>
> As well, it seems you have reached that magic place where you are able to
> achieve some predictability and thus consistency in your work.
>
> Are you finding that, for the type of work you do, you prefer the SL's
> viewinder to that of the R8?
>
> Bob in Seattle
>
Thanks for the comments, Bob. I find the SL's viewfinder - or SL2 with a
diopter correction lens - much easier to focus quickly and accurately,
especially with the 560+1.4x extender. IMHO an SL viewfinder would make the
R8 perfect.
--
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: two more
- From: Robert O. SHAW
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] two more
- » [LRflex] Re: two more
- » [LRflex] Re: two more
- » [LRflex] Re: two more
- » [LRflex] Re: two more
- » [LRflex] Re: two more
- [LRflex] Re: two more
- From: Robert O. SHAW