[LRflex] Re: leicareflex Digest V6 #26
- From: Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard@xxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:46:15 +0100
Chris L wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Charlie Falke <chfalke@xxxxxxx>
Even now, I still think of reflex cameras a little bit as something
you use for long lenses,
_____
Also on a reflex, Zoom lenses are an asset too. Versatile and helps
composition sometimes. Some even use Leica glass and are really good,
aren't they David? ;-)
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2oo8/2008-PAW-25b-20080614-P1050100.jpg.html>
A bad example with Oly 70-300 at 300
_________
Not only.. For close-ups/macros
Agreed
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/123516-2/Dandelion+-+Sunshine.jpg>
Macro Elmarit R
and for use with extreme wide-angles, SLRs have some distinct advantages.
For example, a 15mm Super-Elmar (on the SL2, won't fit the SL, as also
the 19mm second version won't) is a very different animal from a
Cosina-Voightländer 15mm on a rangefinder camera. The ability to get
very close and to exactly compose and choose the foreground-background
relationships gives very different results.
Also agreed
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/151085-1/Oban+-+Scotland+_1+sur+1_.jpg>
Quick snap on a windy day - D-Vario Elmarit at 14
In short, an RF can do wonderful things, of which an R can do nearly all
- silence and bulk/weight seem to me the only issues. Yet, they don't
show in the pictures, do they? - and Rs can do so many things RFs are so
tedious to try and perform with - thinking of visoflex here....
Bien cordialement de Metz
Phx
The same holds true, though to a lesser degree, when using 19/21mm lenses.
Chris
Other related posts: