[LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:32:59 +0100
Take a look at some physics sites about black body radiation - there are
quite a few interesting things about what frequencies/wavelengths are
actually absorbed and what is reflected (there may very probably even be
a colour temperature factor in there somewhere too) - Too many pages to
give actual links, and enough reading for a week.
Douglas
William Abbott wrote:
> To all seekers of truth:
>
> See
>
> http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mblackcool.html
>
> http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01173.htm
>
> All the best,
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Nov 26, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:
>
>
>> OK David. I am ready to tackle the black fabric question. Still
>> about 30
>> message behind, though.
>>
>> I guess I really don't have an answer, or a guess like Colin, but I
>> do have
>> a few thoughts. The IR can only come from two sources.
>> 1) Light is being absorbed by the dark pigments and degraded to
>> heat and
>> re-radiated. This is happening in both non-synthetic and synthetic
>> materials.
>> 2) Ambient IR is being reflected from the surfaces. I assume this
>> is also
>> happening to some extent from both fabrics.
>>
>> So, how to figure out what is going on. I could suggest two possible
>> experiments.
>>
>> 1. Find some synthetic and non-synthetic black material that when
>> photographed with film or read with a light meter give the same black
>> readings. They absorb the same amount of visible light. Now
>> photograph
>> them in a very cold room (walk in freezer or outside on a day like
>> today)
>> and see what the results are. Maybe synthetics re-radiate at a
>> different
>> wavelength than non-synthetics?
>>
>> 2. Using an IR flash, photograph them in total darkness to see if
>> there is
>> any difference in what they reflect. Maybe synthetics reflect more
>> IR than
>> non-synthetics.
>>
>> I do not think there is any reason to believe that just because an
>> object is
>> black it behaves the same as far as absorbing or reflecting in the
>> IR range.
>> Some materials may be very good at absorbing visible and IR, and
>> others
>> only visible.
>>
>> I don't have an IR flash nor do I have an M8 to try these. Also
>>
>>
>>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- From: Aram Langhans
- [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- From: William Abbott
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- » [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- » [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- » [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- From: Aram Langhans
- [LRflex] Re: Was a bunch of stuff, black fabric
- From: William Abbott