Dr=2E Elliot Puritz <drpuritz@bellsouth=2Enet> wrote: > I guess if the new camera had AF or assist that could be=20 > intentionally turned off as desired then all of us would be satisfied! What would satisfy me is an SL-quality viewfinder, and if AF is incorporated in the camera then the AF would have to be able to be LOCKED off - with multiple steps nessesary to unlock it=2E Since I have yet to s= ee an AF camera with an SL-quality viewfinder I'm not holding my breath=2E Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web LIVE =96 Free email based on Microsoft=AE Exchange technology - http://link=2Email2web=2Ecom/LIVE ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/