[LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke question on M

You guys….   You’re such kidders.

 

Aram

Drooling for a R10, forget the SL3 and 9.2 Diesel

 

From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philippe AMARD
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:00 PM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke
question on M

 

Get me two Miha, it'll help me wait for the R 9.2 Diesel ;-) 
Phx


Miha Golobic wrote:



Why complicate with adapters when new SL3 full frame digital will be
available this December for 1000 bucks  ;-)))

 

Miha

2008/11/28 Chris L <speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx>

3003 Cartridge:  Yes!  I've thought and dreamed about it.

Maybe one day, if I find a trashed full-frame DSLR, I could recover the
sensor and the electronics, though I doubt I have good enough technical
skills....


Chris




----- Original Message ----
From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:24:35 PM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke
question on M

Aha! we dream the same dreams!! :-)

And would a digital back for the 3003 go down well, too?

Sadly never to be- at least not unless I win the jackpot of the national
lottery, then I'll take a taxi and a briefcase full of cash to
Braunschweig and ask what the new Franke and Heidecke boffins can do.

Douglas

Chris L wrote:
> How about any Rolleiflex to M adapters?
>
> That would get me an 18mm and an M-Fisheye!  :-)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:27:50 PM
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke
question on M
>
> The only M alternatives are Leica and Zeiss, which cost you an arm and a
leg (bothe legs in the case of Leica) and a couple of Vogtländers that cost
5 to 10 times the price of an adapter.
>
> If you can find one, get a Yashica 3.5/21 it is a fantastic lens (as is
their 2.8/55 Macro, but that's another story, I don't think scale focussing
accuracy would be too good with it on an M) and a C/Y to Leica-M adapter -
come to think of it, that's a cheap way of getting the excellent CZ 1.4/50
and the glorious bokeh of the 1.4/85 on a Leica M, too. :-)
>
> I think I'll forget the R to M adapter and go for the C/Y to M.
>
> Cheers
> Douglas
>
> red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> I stand corrected.... on a Visoflex, focus is for close ups only... for
an M body, infinity focus is preserved.
>>
>> Brings up an ineresting cost issue for a 21 Leica lens on an M body.....
R lenses
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>>    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>>
>>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>  http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
>    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
 http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
   http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/




------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
   http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: