[LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double stroke question on M

Get me two Miha, it'll help me wait for the R 9.2 Diesel  ;-)
Phx


Miha Golobic wrote:
Why complicate with adapters when new SL3 full frame digital will be available this December for 1000 bucks ;-))) Miha
2008/11/28 Chris L <speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx>> 

    3003 Cartridge:  Yes!  I've thought and dreamed about it.

    Maybe one day, if I find a trashed full-frame DSLR, I could
    recover the sensor and the electronics, though I doubt I have good
    enough technical skills....

    Chris




    ----- Original Message ----
    From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx
    <mailto:douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>>
    To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 7:24:35 PM
    Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now double
    stroke question on M

    Aha! we dream the same dreams!! :-)

    And would a digital back for the 3003 go down well, too?

    Sadly never to be- at least not unless I win the jackpot of the
    national
    lottery, then I'll take a taxi and a briefcase full of cash to
    Braunschweig and ask what the new Franke and Heidecke boffins can do.

    Douglas

    Chris L wrote:
    > How about any Rolleiflex to M adapters?
    >
    > That would get me an 18mm and an M-Fisheye!  :-)
    >
    > Chris
    >
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message ----
    > From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@xxxxxx
    <mailto:douglas.sharp@xxxxxx>>
    > To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:27:50 PM
    > Subject: [LRflex] Re: Was : Leicaflex Everready Cases - now
    double stroke question on M
    >
    > The only M alternatives are Leica and Zeiss, which cost you an
    arm and a leg (bothe legs in the case of Leica) and a couple of
    Vogtländers that cost 5 to 10 times the price of an adapter.
    >
    > If you can find one, get a Yashica 3.5/21 it is a fantastic lens
    (as is their 2.8/55 Macro, but that's another story, I don't think
    scale focussing accuracy would be too good with it on an M) and a
    C/Y to Leica-M adapter - come to think of it, that's a cheap way
    of getting the excellent CZ 1.4/50 and the glorious bokeh of the
    1.4/85 on a Leica M, too. :-)
    >
    > I think I'll forget the R to M adapter and go for the C/Y to M.
    >
    > Cheers
    > Douglas
    >
    > red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >
    >> I stand corrected.... on a Visoflex, focus is for close ups
    only... for an M body, infinity focus is preserved.
    >>
    >> Brings up an ineresting cost issue for a 21 Leica lens on an M
    body..... R lenses
    >>
    >> Frank
    >>
    >>
    >> ------
    >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    >>    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
    >> Archives are at:
    >>    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
    >>
    >>
    >>
    > ------
    > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    >  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
    > Archives are at:
    >  http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------
    > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    >    http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
    > Archives are at:
    >    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
    >
    >
    ------
    Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
     http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
    Archives are at:
       http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/




    ------
    Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
      http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
    Archives are at:
       http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: