[LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:42:45 +0100
Hi Colin, you're right,
From breakfast to photography, the readiness is all
Shakespeare time now. ;-)
Phil
Colin Howarth wrote:
>On 21.11.2006, at 21:27, Philippe Amard wrote:
>
>
>
>>may I maintain that dark wolour transfer heat (or cold) faster?
>>
>>
>
>You are free to maintain whatever you wish.
>
>
>
>>This is science, not me.
>>
>>
>
>No, maintaining something is not science, as such :)
>
>
>
>>BTW why do you think the people in the Sahara desert dress in dark
>>clothes?
>>
>>
>
>It looks really cool :) Or because they want to get hot quickly
>during the day, and cold quickly during the night?
>
>
>
>>They must have had time to have "hands-on-experience", long before
>>scientists got any interest in that.
>>
>>
>
>There are plenty of people wearing white clothes in hot sunny places
>too.
>
>I've had hands-on experience with black and white objects in
>sunlight. The black ones get hotter.
>
>
>There are a variety of ways of transferring energy to and from a
>body. Absorbing / radiating light is one of them, and black objects
>are indeed "better" at absorbing / radiating than white ones.
>
>That doesn't apply to conduction though. Indeed covering something
>with a nice thick insulating coat of paint will reduce conduction.
>
>In any real life problem, there are a variety of factors at work, and
>the system probably isn't in equilibrium. Good luck with the egg
>experiment. You'd need identical eggs and a very accurate way of
>measuring the egg-readiness :)
>
>colin
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Thomas Schofield
- [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Colin Howarth
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- » [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Thomas Schofield
- [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] Re: Was: Comparison of M8 Photos in Infra-Red - is now "rubbish?"
- From: Colin Howarth