[LRflex] Re: Vertical panos - reasoning for it

You do use more files, so more pixels. I have tried a few and one thing I notice is that since the narrow side is on top/bottom, there seems to be less curvature that shows up in the final merger. Before, at times, I would get so much curvature that I needed to crop the top and bottom so much I would loose some of what I was after. That does not appear to happen when shooting vertical. Of course, I am not using any fancy devices. Sometimes even hand holding and overlapping by eye. seems to work for me, though. 

Aram

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Edward Caliguri" <ejcaliguri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:21 AM
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LRflex] Vertical panos - reasoning for it


Hi(
I don't know if it has been mentioned,,but I recall reading somewhere - that if possible shoot your Panoramas vertical if you can in order to increase the pixel count I'n that direction. It may take more 'panels' to tile for a given area, but in the end the file is much larger and detailed. 

Is this correct?

Thanks,
Ed

------------------------




------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
   http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
  http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
   http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: