At 20/04/2006, you wrote: > >What was within range, was a Killdeer. I didn't have the monopod > >with me, so I took a few, only to find several were spoiled by > >motion. However, this one seemed OK. > > > >http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/killdeer.htm > > > >Comments appreciated... criticism grudgingly accepted, as always! ;-) > > > >I suppose the ones with motion blur are the ones showing the bird's legs? Hi Doug! Nope! Motion blur (aka camera shake) was caused by bitterly cold winds... (not to mention the poor skills of the camera holder... ) For legs, see: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/killdeer-2.htm Thanks for looking.... --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt Limited Edition Prints at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/prints.htm Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/