>What was within range, was a Killdeer. I didn't have the monopod >with me, so I took a few, only to find several were spoiled by >motion. However, this one seemed OK. > >http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/killdeer.htm > >Comments appreciated... criticism grudgingly accepted, as always! ;-) > I suppose the ones with motion blur are the ones showing the bird's legs? Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
