[LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:05:52 +0100
No wall Neil, but my mind. You're right about the chain.
Temple Bar: both pictures are now side by side on my site for better
comparison.
Style: a friend of mine 'signs" his pictures by using very wide angles
and playing with distortion. It works wonderfully in his slide shows.
But I find it less convincing when you wach the pictures individually.
This, of course is a matter of personal taste.
Thanks for viewing and commenting.
Yours
Phileicangemix.
Neil Gould wrote:
>Hi Phillipe,
>
>Recently, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: [LRflex] TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
>>
>>Morning Listers,
>>1) I recently posted a snap of Temple Bar on the LUG Gallery and David
>>suggested the verticals were not what they should be - and I assume he
>>was right.
>>I have used PS to try and improve on it a bit.
>>I'd like your comments on the results. The pictures can be found here.
>><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/IRELAND-2oo7/?g2_page=2>
>>REM: it might be a bit long for the full scale files to download.
>>
>>
>>
>I didn't see your previous picture, but I don't find this one to be
>offensive. Having recently seen an art exhibit on Barcelona that includes
>several enlarged photos with some serious distortion, the distortion in
>this shot seems rather mild by comparison, and I think the subject easily
>overtakes the technical compromise.
>
>
>
>>2) On the same page, you'll find a picture of a flight of iron stairs;
>>my problem here is symmetry: can someone explain to me what went
>>wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>Nice shot! It would be nice to see the entire chain at the bottom against
>the entire arch at the top. Could you have taken another step or two back
>to capture this shot, or was your back against the wall?
>
>Best regards,
>
>Neil
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Neil Gould
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Neil Gould