[LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Juan Gea-Banacloche <banacloj@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:49:23 -0500
Philippe,
I checked Chasseur d'Images #287 (October 2006), where they tested =20
the L1. The viewfinder shows 95% (6.5M pix instead of 7.5 MPix). =20
(This is considered "une couverture correcte et assez bien centr=E9e"). =20=
They provide a drawing superimposing the viewfinder image with the =20
image obtained, and it looks like there is more of the right side =20
"missimg" from the viewfinder.
A few tests with your own camera should easily confirm or rule out =20
this. It may even vary slightly from one camera body to the next!).
Juan
On Jan 25, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Philippe Amard wrote:
> Thanks Juan,
> you might be righ - I hexperienced this with my old Nikkormat (good
> memories) -, and it would mean that the viewfinder acts as if it were
> shifted to the right-hand side in my case. Funny thing. I'll try some
> shots with the VF and Liveview to check if this may be the cause. And
> report of course as the Digilux3 could have the same 'flaw'.
>
> Thanks for contributing to my improvement.
> Yours
> Phileicangeemix.
>
>
> BanacloJ wrote:
>
>> Philippe,
>> Regarding the first one, I never try to correct verticals completely
>> (many times I do not correct them at all). There may be a "set-in-
>> stone" rule about this, but I think if it is your picture , you do
>> with it what you like. If the vanishing lines don't bother you, don't
>> touch them.
>>
>> The second is an example, I am afraid, of the viewfinder not showing
>> 100% of the frame, and the "cropping" not being uniform. Grab your
>> camera, and make a few experiments and you will see what I mean: the
>> viewfinder on my Nikon D50 shows the horizon tilted and crops more on
>> the right than on the left. After practicing a bit, one can get a
>> feeling for it-- and the ability to check immediately what you get
>> helps to shoot it "properly" right away.
>>
>> (In fact, I think these are the is the only possible explanations:
>> either you were badly mistaken or the viewfinder was not showing you
>> all there was to see).
>>
>> Juan
>>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: BanacloJ
- [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Philippe Amard
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- » [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- [LRflex] TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: BanacloJ
- [LRflex] Re: TECH: Questions on quality and taste.
- From: Philippe Amard